A Pooja Sood
profile i had written in 2006 monsoons...then as sr. editor
mattersofart.com...it has been seven years, so much has changed...so much has
not.
The Passion To Explore
mattersofart.com takes a look at the energy
that appears to benchmark Pooja Sood’s curatorial skills, adding value to a
still-nascent profession
When mattersofart.com
took the editorial decision to re-think the ‘Artist of the month’ and
reposition it as ‘In Focus’, the attempt was to be able to broaden the
possibilities and enable one to feature personalities who have been making a
difference to the course of contemporary Indian art. It was also to be able
to look beyond artists and ‘to bring in focus’ practices which are exciting
and cutting edge.
Profiling Pooja Sood, as the first non-artist ‘In
Focus’ was initially prompted by two back-to-back curations that happened in
mid-September at KHOJ (Public Art Residency) and then at the Apeejay
Media Gallery (Ghosts in the Machine and other Tales, video, sound, animation
and interactive media). It is difficult to remember two large ‘alternative’
art ‘event/spectacles’ curated in near simultaneity by one curator in India.
As one continued to be clued to her, one realised that her intensity of
programming just continues. At KHOJ, Sood followed up her summer residency by
curating Vasuda
Tazur and Brendan Jamison in continuation with its rendezvous with
public art and her engagement in trying to locate the new genre in the Indian
urban context. KHOJ has only just now wound up a Sound Art Residency and is
about to explore ‘Water’ as a medium before it goes back to re-interrogating
Performance Art. An exhausting load of programming by any standard, and if
there is something that defines Pooja Sood’s curatorial practice, it is her
‘bundle of energy’ and with it the desire to push margins...sometimes with
all that energy.
Every time one attempts to label her as a curator,
there is a resistance that creeps up one’s fingers as they write. If
one has to adequately analyse her functional ‘role’ in Indian contemporary
art, to bracket her as a curator is to take the easy way out. This ignores
the energy gone into institution building and their pedagogical value. And if
one is to ignore the energy, then Pooja Sood becomes shallow as an ‘exciting
curator”; but it is not possible to ignore her as a fundraiser and
institution builder. Casting her is a task that demands a critical fineness,
which makes it enticing.
Through the late 1990s when traditional
institutions, particularly those not supporting a certain right wing culture,
were winding down, especially in the context of culture, Sood carried forward
the experience she had gained from Eicher Gallery, playing a pivotal role in
structuring KHOJ, and nursing it to make it the hub of alternative art
practices. Underlying all the curations (de-curatrions?) at KHOJ is Pooja’s
passionate agenda to explore something new.
Critically speaking, one can disagree with the
framework within which she operates: urbanism is understood and practiced in
both KHOJ and Apeejay in a manner, which is elitist,
if one goes by certain definitions of elitism. Even at the micro-project
level, there are possibilities to ‘fault’ the presentations of the KHOJ
projects, the manner in which they are conceptualised, and the criticism it
does not allow. But then, it is also possible to dis-acknowledge the
restrictions within which she operates.
She is arguably the best fund-raiser for
experimental art projects and the manner in which she has channelised her skills
to “constantly push for something new…something exciting”. In fact, this
‘push’ for the exciting is what marks her curatorial practice and her
contribution to the contemporary Indian art scene. The kind of artists she
has in introduced and nurtured is a very good indication of her curatorial
skills (if one looks at curation as being able to sense and put together art
practitioners in a certain way).
At this point, there is also a certain flourish, a
certain coming to age, which reflects in the work that she does. “After 40
you just don’t care” , that kind of hedonism is tempered by her
realisation that for her to really exploit pedagogical value additions she is
capable of making in contemporary Indian art, she needs to pay heed to the
academic interest within her. She needs to revisit all the possibilities that
she has only skimmed through till now and explore the full impact of the
‘mediamatic’ and the ‘practitional’ explorations she has indulged in. But
then, Pooja will always be driven by her ‘bundle of energy’ and ‘going slow’
is not her ‘style’.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment